If, like me, you’ve had enough drama and discord from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to last a lifetime, the prospect of three open seats on the court is probably a source of both hope and concern. With so much change coming to the court, and with it likely to be far and away the most expensive judicial race Pennsylvania has ever seen, it’s really in everyone’s best interest if bar associations and lawyers explain what we should be looking for from our future justices.
Various organizations scrutinize and evaluate the candidates, and that’s good. But I also think we ought to let the candidates know from the outset what we expect from them. Then it’s important to communicate to the public how the various candidates measure against those expectations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
