In this action between a home builder and the second owner, defendants' lack of privity objection was a mere legal conclusion and failed to justify dismissal of the complaint, while their objection to the "fraud" claim failed to make clear to what claim of misrepresentation it referred. Preliminary objections dismissed in part and sustained in part.
February 03, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CONSUMER PROTECTION
Privity • Home Construction • Fraud• Personal Liability
Carrington v. F.D. Builders Inc., PICS Case No. 15-0134 (C.P. Chester Oct. 21, 2014) Tunnell, J. (6 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
