Editor’s note: The author and his firm filed an amicus brief in the Rost case discussed below.
It’s been three months since the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Tincher v. Omega Flex, 104 A.3d 328, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 3031 (Pa. 2014), and although the number of articles covering the ruling are legion, the legal community has yet to feel the decision’s full impact. Application of appellate precedent such as Tincher is the focus of this article.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
