According to the special prosecutor who looked into state Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s alleged leak of grand jury secrets, the investigation was proper despite the expiration of a law establishing the authority to appoint special prosecutors.
Kane, who could face criminal charges over the alleged leak, has challenged the supervising grand jury judge’s authority to appoint the special prosecutor who carried out the investigation. She has argued, among other things, that the expiration of the Independent Counsel Authorization Act left supervising grand jury Judge William R. Carpenter without the authority to appoint the special prosecutor to investigate the leak.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]