As a matter of law, a letter bearing the heading "AUDIT NOTICE" did not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, when it was clear from reading the letter in its entirety that the audit referred to applied to the defendant's client and even the least sophisticated debtor could not interpret the letter to mean that the recipient would be audited. Motion for summary judgment granted.
March 10, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CONSUMER PROTECTION
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act • Least Sophisticated Consumer Test
Santiago v. A.R. Resources, Inc., PICS Case No. 15-0347 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2015) O’Neill, J. (7 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
