Allegations that defendant Uber Technologies engaged in unfair competition, in violation of Pennsylvania law, and did not comply with Philadelphia ordinances and regulations were the province of state and local legislative authorities. Motion for preliminary injunction denied.
March 17, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CONSUMER PROTECTION
Unfair Competition • Local Ordinances • Preliminary Injunction
Checker Cab Phila. Inc. v. Uber Tech. Inc., PICS Case No. 15-0377 (E.D. Pa. March 3, 2015) Alejandro, J. (7 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
