A contentious patent dispute between drone makers is heading toward trial to determine damages, since the federal judge handling the case entered default judgment against the defendant as a sanction after months of discovery delays.
U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab of the Western District of Pennsylvania denied two motions this week from the defendant, the French drone-maker Parrot. Neither the motion for summary judgment nor the motion to dismiss convinced the judge to do anything but head toward determining damages in the case brought by Drone Technologies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
