A plaintiff’s contested residency claims regarding an underinsured motorist coverage policy will be tried separately from the plaintiff’s action regarding a motor vehicle collision, a court of common pleas judge has ruled.
Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas Judge Terrence R. Nealon ruled April 15 that the trial in Kujawski v. Fogmeg should be bifurcated because the dispute over whether the plaintiff is entitled to UIM coverage involved a separate set of facts from the motor vehicle accident that led to the action against the tortfeasor.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
