A doctor is barred from practicing near a hospital under a restrictive covenant agreement, even though his former employer could have damages, the state Superior Court has ruled.
A split three-judge panel of the court ruled April 24 that just because Geisinger Health System could possibly calculate some of the damages sustained by the doctor’s breach of the restrictive covenant did not mean that the doctor should not be enjoined from practicing near the hospital.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
