Litigants who catalyze the defense to change course in an ERISA case, even if there is no judgment from the court, can still seek to collect attorney fees in the Third Circuit.
The appeals court made the ruling in a decision that officially endorsed for the first time the catalyst theory for attorney fee recovery in cases brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
