The state Superior Court has remanded a sex-crime victim’s Fraudulent Transfer Act suit for further consideration about whether the perpetrator and the businessman who purchased the perpetrator’s small business are indispensable parties in the case.
A three-judge panel of the court in Brodsky v. MJC Industries ruled that the trial court failed to address the defendant company’s challenge to the court’s jurisdiction and its argument that the plaintiff failed to join indispensable parties.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
