As e-discovery matures, it is typically no longer a surprise when outside counsel raises the issue of spoliation and the need to draft and issue a legal hold when a company gets sued. But what counsel may not always appreciate is that it is not just the filing of a complaint that can trigger the need to issue a legal hold—instead, it is whenever litigation is reasonably anticipated. So what does this mean in practice? And are there best practices in-house counsel can implement to ensure that potentially relevant evidence is preserved and to avoid the risk of spoliation claims down the road? This article aims to answer these questions.
When Does the Duty to Preserve Arise?
Many practitioners use the term “litigation hold,” but the term “legal hold” may be a better choice because it helps drive home the point that the duty to preserve potentially relevant evidence sometimes arises much earlier than the date that a complaint and summons are served.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
