Petitioners were prohibited from operating a catering business out of their home because the operation of such a business was not an accessory use customarily incidental to use as a residence; therefore, they could not rent out their property and give greater property rights to a commercial tenant. Affirmed.
June 23, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
LAND USE AND PLANNING
Zoning Ordinance • Permitted Uses • Accessory Use • Unnecessary Hardship
Barnabei v. Chadds Ford Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., PICS Case No. 15-0936 (Pa. Commw. June 10, 2015) Brobson, J. (14 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The University of Iowa College of Law anticipates hiring lateral faculty members in the areas of Family Law and Business Law. APPLICATION ...
NY auto defense firm seeks experienced TRIAL ATTORNEY to do trials, motions, court appearances, and depositions.Salary range 115K-150K depen...
The New York State Unified Court System is one of the largest court systems in the nation with over 16,000 judges and non-judicial employees...
