The state Superior Court has allowed a construction company to proceed with its negligent-misrepresentation case against an architectural firm for allegedly providing inadequate design plans.
In so ruling, a unanimous three-judge panel said the construction company did not need to make an explicit misrepresentation before it could recover in the case. The ruling in Gongloff Contracting v. L. Robert Kimball & Associates, Architects and Engineers, which was issued July 8, reversed a court of common pleas decision to toss the construction company’s claims.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
