In Callowhill Neighborhood Association v. City of Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2015 Pa. Commw. LEXIS (June 17, 2015), the Commonwealth Court decided whether a municipal plan examiner abused her discretion when she relied upon a consent order declaring that a static billboard sign was legal and a subsequently issued administrative memorandum confirming same when she issued a zoning permit converting the sign into a digital one.
In 1985, there was a non-accessory two-sided billboard sign erected on the 1100 block of Vine Street in the city of Philadelphia by way of a zoning permit, the opinion said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
