CIVIL PROCEDURE
Class Action • Typicality • Commonality •Adequacy
Gillis v. Respond Power, PICS Case No. 15-1404 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2015) Shapiro, J. (7 pages).
If named party plaintiffs possess different views of their rights, a court can find that plaintiffs did not prove that questions of law or fact existed that were common to the class. Motion to certify putative class action denied.
September 15, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Class Action • Typicality • Commonality •Adequacy
Gillis v. Respond Power, PICS Case No. 15-1404 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2015) Shapiro, J. (7 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Gill & Chamas, LLC seeks a Personal Injury attorney to work in their Woodbridge, NJ office. Candidate must possess the following: ...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...