Deposition of a high-ranking executive of defendant was quashed under the apex doctrine, where plaintiff could not demonstrate that the executive had personal or superior knowledge of facts alleged or that information could not be obtained through lower-level employees or less burdensome employees. Subpoena quashed.
September 15, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Reimbursement of Unapproved Prescriptions • Violation of State “Anti-Kickback” Statutes • Motion to Quash Subpoena • Apex Doctrine
United States ex rel Galmines v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., PICS Case No. 15-1391 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2015) Pratter, J. (5 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
