Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion to open a default judgment because the petition was untimely, appellant failed to present a justifiable excuse for the delay, appellant failed to present a meritorious defense. Affirmed.
September 22, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Default Judgment • Petition to Open • Service of Process • Meritorious Defense • Timeliness
Obermayer, Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, LLP v. Third Pillar Sys. Inc., PICS Case No. 15-1419 (Pa. Super. Sept, 4, 2015) (memorandum) Panella, J. (7 pages).
Kirkland’s $40 Million Haul from Rite Aid Bankruptcy Doubles Initial Compensation for Opioid Victims
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Senior Business Attorney A 100% remote boutique law firm seeking a seasoned business attorney to support a growing base of major corporate ...
Don t miss this opportunity to utilize your transaction and housing legal skills to help shape the future of Placer County. Join the Real Pr...
Civil Litigation Attorneys, don t miss this opportunity! Placer County Counsel s Office is seeking a Civil Litigation Attorney to assist in ...
