Plaintiff's claim was not typical of proposed class members where alleged deception by insurance company of legality of purchased policies pursuant to case law did not apply to plaintiff. Order of the trial court affirmed.
September 29, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
INSURANCE LAW
Stacked Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Coverage • Unfair and Deceptive Business Practices • Class Certification “Typicality” Requirement
Vensko v. Encompass Home and Auto Ins. Co., PICS Case No. 15-1452 (Pa. Super. Sept. 11, 2015) (memorandum) Musmanno, J. (18 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
