With the Pennsylvania judiciary ensnared in yet another scandal, transparency is the watchword of the day among candidates for judgeships on the state’s intermediate appellate courts. Transparency in all its facets—judges’ behavior, their recusal from cases and their rulings—took center stage Oct. 15 in a televised forum in Harrisburg.
The spate of judicial scandals—and how the courts can find a way forward with the public’s confidence in tow—underpinned the discussions, as the candidates offered their thoughts on what incoming judges can do to chart a new course.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
