Defendant home improvement company that misrepresented its credentials was not liable to homeowners for breach of contract, but were liable for plaintiffs' attorney fees under the UTPCPL as actual damages.
November 03, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Home Improvement Contracts • Breach • Attorney Fees
Litwack v. Dreamline, PICS Case No. 15-1628 (C.P. Chester Aug. 26, 2015) Tunnell, J. (40 pages).
Defendant home improvement company that misrepresented its credentials was not liable to homeowners for breach of contract, but were liable for plaintiffs’ attorney fees under the UTPCPL as actual damages.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a junior level commercial litigation associate admitted to practice in Connecticut, with a d...
