The state Superior Court has ruled that an attorney does not have standing to sue his former partner over issues related to the dissolution of their former firm, which, among other things, has included one partner accusing the other of diverting firm money to pay for child support following an affair.
A three-judge panel of the court Dec. 11 affirmed the lower court’s ruling in Frost v. Zeff, which held the attorneys could not sue each other due to lack of standing and failing to file suit within the applicable statute of limitations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
