A convicted murderer can assert a successful claim for DNA testing of crime scene evidence by raising the possibility that the test may reveal the identity of another person who actually killed the victim, the Superior Court has ruled.

An en banc panel of the court ruled Tuesday in In re Payne, affirming a trial court’s order granting John M. Payne’s Post-Conviction Relief Act request for DNA testing. Payne was convicted of second-degree murder in 1986, and is seeking DNA testing of physical evidence taken from the scene of the crime, which ­occurred in 1981.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]