Plaintiff failed to preserve any issues for review on appeal where his concise statement filed pursuant to Pa.R.App.P. 1925(a) was impermissibly vague and mere boilerplate. Affirmed.
January 12, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CONTRACTS
Procedure • Rule 1925(a) Statement • Impermissibly Vague • Preservation of Issues
Antonella v. Kraemer, Manes & Assoc. LLC, PICS Case No. 16-0005 (Pa. Dec. 16, 2015) (memorandum) Elliott, J. (10 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
