A hospital’s failure to present a patient’s discharge instructions to her for review before the document was introduced at cross-examination could have prejudiced the plaintiff’s medical malpractice suit, the Superior Court has ruled in reversing a defense verdict.

In a Jan. 21 memorandum opinion, a unanimous three-judge panel held that the jury in Bonilla v. Jeanes Hospital could have been influenced by the belief that Quadina Bonilla was the cause of her injuries for failing to follow discharge instructions ordering her to seek immediate medical help if symptoms arose. Bonilla had been presented with summary discharge instructions, but not the extended discharge instructions with the warning, the court said.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]