Trial court properly denied a motion to quash subpoenas filed by employer of experts hired to perform an OSHA inspection pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §1908.1 et seq. of plaintiff's employer's workplace, because the subsections of §1908 relied on were not applicable, since they referred to state disclosure. Affirmed.
February 13, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Occupational Safety and Health • Depositions • Discovery • Appealable Collateral Order
Price v. Simakas Co. Inc., PICS Case No. 16-0179 (Pa. Super. Feb. 1, 2016) Stabile, J. (13 pages).
Trial court properly denied a motion to quash subpoenas filed by employer of experts hired to perform an OSHA inspection pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §1908.1 et seq. of plaintiff’s employer’s workplace, because the subsections of §1908 relied on were not applicable, since they referred to state disclosure. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
