The trial court did not err in its award of damages, where the UTPCPL did not authorize any particular calculation of actual damages. Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part; case remanded for further proceedings.
February 26, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Variable Life Insurance Policy • Negligent/Fraudulent Misrepresentation • Breach of Fiduciary Duty • Calculation of Damages
Dibish v. Ameriprise Fin., Inc., PICS Case No. 16-0241 (Pa. Super. Feb. 16, 2016) Bender, J. (34 pages).
The trial court did not err in its award of damages, where the UTPCPL did not authorize any particular calculation of actual damages. Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part; case remanded for further proceedings.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...
