Summary judgment was proper for defendant property owner in slip and fall case where evidence and testimony demonstrated that snow and ice had not accumulated in "hills and ridges" such as to subject defendant to liability. Summary judgment affirmed.
April 04, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Slip and Fall • Duty of Care • Obviousness of Dangerous Condition • Evidence of Snow/Ice Accumulation • Summary Judgment
Barron v. Allied Properties, Inc., PICS Case No. 16-0398 (Pa. Super. March 23, 2016) (memorandum) Gantman, P.J. (8 pages).
Summary judgment was proper for defendant property owner in slip and fall case where evidence and testimony demonstrated that snow and ice had not accumulated in “hills and ridges” such as to subject defendant to liability. Summary judgment affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Description:NFSA has a great opportunity for a Labor Relations Associate and Junior Counsel. This position will support NFSA's collective ba...
McCarter & English, LLP is seeking litigation attorneys for our Newark, NJ offices. Candidates must have 3-6 years of law firm experien...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a corporate associate for its office located in Boston, MA. Candidate must have 2 - 5 years ...
