The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision Feb. 17 that is likely to have a significant impact on coverage for additional insureds sued in Pennsylvania by employees of the named insured.
Generally, additional insured status provides coverage for the additional insured that is limited to claims that have a nexus with the activities of the named insured under the policy. While many variations exist, there are generally two formulations of the policy language that express the required nexus.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
