With one historic Pennsylvania Supreme Court election still prominent in the rearview mirror and the possibility of two more seats on the bench up for grabs next year, the political makeup of the high court is a matter of intense focus for many attorneys in the state.
As the process unfolds to place an interim justice on the bench—along with as many as five other interim appellate appointments—the courts are also drawing increased attention in Harrisburg, where a sharp partisan divide has drawn the courts into a political tug-of-war.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
