A plaintiff’s treating physician is not required to provide answers to a series of defense interrogatories if he was not independently retained by plaintiffs counsel, a Lackawanna County judge has ruled upon reconsideration.

In an April 14 decision in Mina v. Hua Mei, Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas Senior Judge Robert A. Mazzoni vacated a Jan. 6 ruling that had ordered Dr. Joseph Chun to respond to 16 expert interrogatories posed by the defense. Mazonni acknowledged that the court had “erroneously placed its entire focus on whether the language of Dr. Chun’s opinions opened the gate for further supplemental discovery.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]