Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s motion to quash charges against her based on selective prosecution revealed a selective memory, the Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office said Monday in a reply brief.
Kane’s “frivolous” motion exhibited a lack of research and a “puzzling” inability to recall a relevant case with ties to both Kane and one of her defense attorneys, the state’s response said. In her effort to detail the selective and vindictive prosecution she claimed brought her to this point, Kane instead wrote “yet another chapter in her wearied feud with individuals not employed by the Montgomery County or Bucks County district attorney’s offices,” the response said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
