The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling last week in Malanchuk v. Tsimura did not change the law in Pennsylvania, attorneys said, but it eliminated confusion that had built up in the intermediate appellate courts of when parties can appeal in consolidated actions.
In 2014, when an en banc Superior Court in Malanchuk overturned a previous Superior Court ruling, it said a summary judgment order entered in one of two consolidated actions could not be appealed until all the actions were resolved.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
