Trial court did not abuse its discretion in terminating father's parental rights pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S.§2511(a)(1) and (b) because father displayed a merely passive interest in the child and shirked all of his parental duties prior to his incarceration. Affirmed.
May 31, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Termination of Parental Rights • 23 Pa.C.S.§2511(a)(1) • Obligation to Perform Parental Duties • Bond With Child
In the Interest of M.E.M., PICS Case No. 16-0672 (Pa. Super. May 19, 2016) (memorandum) Bowes, J. (14 pages).
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in terminating father’s parental rights pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S.§2511(a)(1) and (b) because father displayed a merely passive interest in the child and shirked all of his parental duties prior to his incarceration. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Winkler Kurtz, LLP, a Port Jefferson Station law firm, seeks a Matrimonial Associate Attorney to provide assistance and be involved in all a...
NORTHERN NEW JERSEY LAW FIRM WITH PRACTICE LIMITED TO REPRESENTATION OF ACCIDENT VICTIMS AND INJURED WORKERS SEEKS A WORKERS COMPENSATION A...
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
