The trial court did not err in switching primary physical custody from father to mother where the trial court properly made factual determinations as to mother's ability to provide for child's educational and medical needs. Order of the trial court affirmed.
May 31, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Child Custody • Switching Parent With Primary Physical Custody • Consideration of Prior Abusive Conduct • Willingness of Parent to Cooperate
A.A.K. v. C.M., PICS Case No. 16-0669 (Pa. Super. May 16, 2016) (memorandum) Bowes, J. (13 pages).
The trial court did not err in switching primary physical custody from father to mother where the trial court properly made factual determinations as to mother’s ability to provide for child’s educational and medical needs. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Winkler Kurtz, LLP, a Port Jefferson Station law firm, seeks a Matrimonial Associate Attorney to provide assistance and be involved in all a...
NORTHERN NEW JERSEY LAW FIRM WITH PRACTICE LIMITED TO REPRESENTATION OF ACCIDENT VICTIMS AND INJURED WORKERS SEEKS A WORKERS COMPENSATION A...
We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...
