Commonwealth court correctly held that freight broker could not benefit from the exceptions from local taxation in §301.1(f)(2) of the Local Tax Enabling Act (LTEA) because those exceptions applied only if a common carrier's rates and services were regulated by the Public Utility Commission (PUC). Affirmed.
June 04, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Business Privilege Tax • Exemptions • Public Utility Commission Regulation • Carriers
S & H Transp. Inc. v. York, PICS Case No. 16-0715 (Pa. May 25, 2016) Donohue, J. (17 pages).
Commonwealth court correctly held that freight broker could not benefit from the exceptions from local taxation in §301.1(f)(2) of the Local Tax Enabling Act (LTEA) because those exceptions applied only if a common carrier’s rates and services were regulated by the Public Utility Commission (PUC). Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
ABOUT THIS RECRUITMENTOur attorneys face some of the most challenging, cutting-edge legal issues in the environmental field. As such, we ar...
Hofstra University enrolls over 6,000 undergraduate students and nearly 4,000 graduate students in 13 schools, which feature a variety of de...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate, patent agent, or technical specialist for its Intellectual Property Prac...
