Arbitration in employment litigation has been on the rise for the past decade. That trend has been driven, labor lawyers say, by an increasing number of courts deciding that arbitration clauses barring employees from starting class actions are enforceable, despite claims by workers that their right to trial has been violated in the process.

Employers use these agreements to force employees to litigate their claims on an individual basis. Many federal appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have ruled in favor of mandatory arbitration. But there is at least one exception: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s recent decision in Lewis v. Epic Systems.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]