Six months ago the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling mandating resentencing hearings for the roughly 500 inmates in Pennsylvania prisons who are serving mandatory life without parole sentences handed down while they were juveniles. While several U.S. jurisdictions have started hearing their cases, many across the state have put the issue on hold pending an upcoming state Supreme Court ruling they hope will resolve some lingering questions.

In its January ruling in Montgomery v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that its ban on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles should be applied retroactively. The ruling essentially meant that the nearly 500 inmates in Pennsylvania and thousands across the country serving the unconstitutional sentence would need to be resentenced.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]