Trial court correctly found that there was no agreement between construction company and homeowner for the provision of professional services to assist with litigation and construction management, but trial court erred in holding that homeowner was not unjustly enriched by the provision of construction management services. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
June 17, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Karden Constr. Serv., Inc. v. D’Amico, PICS Case No. 16-0758 (Pa. Super. May 25, 2016) (memorandum) Stabile, J. (11 pages).
Trial court correctly found that there was no agreement between construction company and homeowner for the provision of professional services to assist with litigation and construction management, but trial court erred in holding that homeowner was not unjustly enriched by the provision of construction management services. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
