The involuntary movement of a fully parked vehicle caused by the actions of a third party did not constitute "operation" of the vehicle sufficient to satisfy the motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity under the Tort Claims Act. Summary judgment affirmed.
June 17, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Balentine v. Chester Water Auth., PICS Case No. 16-0746 (Pa. Commw. June 3, 2016) Covey, J. (15 pages).
The involuntary movement of a fully parked vehicle caused by the actions of a third party did not constitute “operation” of the vehicle sufficient to satisfy the motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity under the Tort Claims Act. Summary judgment affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
