The decision over whether Penn State can immediately bring to the state Superior Court its fight for insurance coverage for the sex abuse by Jerry Sandusky lies in the hands of one Philadelphia judge. But, according to attorneys who practice in the insurance arena, the possible appeal raises a series of novel questions.
Earlier this month, Penn State filed a motion requesting interlocutory appeal from a ruling by Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Gary Glazer in Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance v. Pennsylvania State University.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
