Where the commonwealth had proven that a bundle of cash was to be utilized in illegal activity, the mere fact that other bundles of cash were located in proximity to the first bundle was insufficient on its own to support a nexus. Order of the trial court reversed and vacated.
July 01, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Forfeiture of Property • Derivative Contraband • Nexus With Criminal Activity • Innocent Owner Defense
Commonwealth v. Freeman, PICS Case No. 16-0811 (Pa. Commw. June 15, 2016) Brobson, J. (25 pages).
Where the commonwealth had proven that a bundle of cash was to be utilized in illegal activity, the mere fact that other bundles of cash were located in proximity to the first bundle was insufficient on its own to support a nexus. Order of the trial court reversed and vacated.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, NJ is seeking an Experienced Commercial Real Estate/Transactional Attorney for a full-time position. ...
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey is seeking a Litigation Associate NJ Bar admission required. NY admission a plus but is no...
AttorneyJob Code: LEP023Pay Grade: NFLSA Status: ExemptLegal UnitJob Description:This position reports directly to the Chief Legal Officer, ...
