The Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in a crashworthiness case against Volvo may have secured a new trial for the plaintiffs, but both the plaintiffs and defense bars are viewing the ruling as a potential win in a highly unsettled products liability landscape following the Tincher v. Omega Flex decision.
A three-judge panel of the Superior Court on June 24 vacated a defense verdict and granted a new trial in the case, Webb v. Volvo Cars of North America.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
