A lockbox exception to a property damage exclusion in an errors and omissions (E&O) insurance policy held by a real estate agent did not enable coverage for property damage caused by a burst water pipe. Summary judgment affirmed.
July 07, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
E&O Policy • Obligation to Defend and Indemnify • Property Damage Exclusion • Lockbox Exception
Bograd v. Greenwich Ins. Co., PICS Case No. 16-0827 (Pa. Super. June 20, 2016) (memorandum) Stabile, J. (11 pages).
A lockbox exception to a property damage exclusion in an errors and omissions (E&O) insurance policy held by a real estate agent did not enable coverage for property damage caused by a burst water pipe. Summary judgment affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
