In a year in which Pennsylvanians—still reeling from a wave of judicial and political corruption—will be casting their votes in controversial and hotly contested presidential, U.S. Senate and state attorney general races, the outcome of a November vote on whether to raise the judicial retirement age is anything but a foregone conclusion, political observers said.
This, despite the fact that nearly 2.4 million voters unofficially weighed in on that very question during the April primary, ultimately voting 51-49 against a constitutional amendment that would raise the mandatory judicial retirement age from 70 to 75.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
