A bank cannot apply the work-product doctrine to a series of communications exchanged by a consultant it hired to operate an indebted construction company, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled.
A unanimous three-judge panel issued a memorandum opinion July 1 in Giovinazzo v. Susquehanna Bank, affirming a trial court ruling that denied the bank’s claim that the document should be considered privileged.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
