Trial court properly granted employer's motion for a compulsory nonsuit in appellant's action against his employer/building owner asserting dual capacity because appellant could not establish a cause of action under that doctrine. Affirmed.
July 15, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Workers Compensation • Dual Capacity Doctrine • Law of the Case Doctrine
Neidert v. Charlie, PICS Case No. 16-0871 (Pa. Super. June 29, 2016) Mundy, J. (13 pages).
Trial court properly granted employer’s motion for a compulsory nonsuit in appellant’s action against his employer/building owner asserting dual capacity because appellant could not establish a cause of action under that doctrine. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
