An insurer cannot rely on an outside database to reduce reimbursement paid to a trauma care provider for an employee’s injuries under the Workers’ Compensation Act, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.

A unanimous three-judge panel ruled July 6 in Allegheny General Hospital v. Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Fee Review Hearing Office that a medical fee hearing officer relied on a database without accurate information on the “usual and customary charge” for trauma care charges at providers in the same geographic region. The court reversed the decision and remanded for a determination of the usual charges, while also denying the provider’s request to be reimbursed at 100 percent of its actual charges.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]