Trial court's order dismissing appellant's amended complaint and giving him the opportunity to present his claims in a pending arbitration was not a final order because it did not dispose of "all claims" or "all parties" and was an interlocutory order and not appealable. Appeal quashed.
July 21, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Final Order • “All Claims” • “All Parties” • Interlocutory Order
McCarthy v. Armstrong, PICS Case No. (Pa. Super. July 8, 2016) (memorandum) Stevens, P.J. (9 pages).
Trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s amended complaint and giving him the opportunity to present his claims in a pending arbitration was not a final order because it did not dispose of “all claims” or “all parties” and was an interlocutory order and not appealable. Appeal quashed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
