Trial court erred in upholding zoning board's grant of two variances for minimum lot size and one variance for maximum density because applicant did not show any unnecessary hardship. Reversed.
July 21, 2016 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Zoning • Variance • Unnecessary Hardship • “De Minimis” • Maximum Density
Dunn v. Middletown Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., PICS Case No. 16-0909 (Pa. Commw. July 11, 2016) Simpson, J. (34 pages).
Trial court erred in upholding zoning board’s grant of two variances for minimum lot size and one variance for maximum density because applicant did not show any unnecessary hardship. Reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
